<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for emotionistic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emotionistic.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emotionistic.com</link>
	<description>living life to the fullest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Relationships And Health by Social Technology</title>
		<link>http://emotionistic.com/posts/social-relationships-and-health/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emotionistic.com/?p=895#comment-269</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Old Social Technology...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found your entry interesting thus I&#039;ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Old Social Technology&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found your entry interesting thus I&#8217;ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Relationships: What Makes Them &#8220;Great&#8221;? by Panopticon</title>
		<link>http://emotionistic.com/posts/great-relationships-what-makes-them-great/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Panopticon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emotionistic.com/?p=928#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Mutual awesomeness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mutual awesomeness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Techniques For Reducing Anxiety by Mom</title>
		<link>http://emotionistic.com/posts/two-techniques-for-reducing-anxiety/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 02:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emotionistic.com/?p=908#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Just thought I would get myself going on reading some of your blogs. This one has some good ideas, some of which I have used and some of which I really didn&#039;t think of.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I would get myself going on reading some of your blogs. This one has some good ideas, some of which I have used and some of which I really didn&#8217;t think of.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Emotionistic by Hillary</title>
		<link>http://emotionistic.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emotionalcow.com/?page_id=2#comment-240</guid>
		<description>I really like your &quot;about&quot; section, it left a tear in my eye! I am going to do your PR from this point forward and we are going to promote your blog and get it out there because I think it is really good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like your &#8220;about&#8221; section, it left a tear in my eye! I am going to do your PR from this point forward and we are going to promote your blog and get it out there because I think it is really good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Relationships And Health by Hillary</title>
		<link>http://emotionistic.com/posts/social-relationships-and-health/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emotionistic.com/?p=895#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Sounds like you better do a lot more &quot;friend-making&quot; and a lot less JUICE-making....there&#039;s some food for thought..jooosh!!! hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like you better do a lot more &#8220;friend-making&#8221; and a lot less JUICE-making&#8230;.there&#8217;s some food for thought..jooosh!!! hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We&#8217;re All &#8220;Addicts&#8221; by Jason</title>
		<link>http://emotionistic.com/posts/were-all-addicts/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emotionistic.com/?p=791#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Yes!  I do the same thing.  And I also suspect that, in an ironic way, some of the very mechanisms that originally evolved to make us &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; productive, in today&#039;s world actually end up making us &lt;i&gt;less&lt;/i&gt; productive.  We probably have mechanisms that are constantly evaluating the activities we&#039;re engaged in to determine how &quot;valuable&quot; they are (to our survival and reproduction).  When an activity has been determined to be valuable, we get a good feeling about it and enjoy doing it (eating, having sex).  But in the same way when an activity is determined to be of low or negative value, we get a bad feeling about it and try to avoid it.

I imagine that our environment now is very different from the one we evolved in, since we have so many very long-term goals (studying so you can &quot;get an A&quot; in a class, doing this for years, so that one day you can &quot;get a good job&quot; so that you can &quot;have money&quot; so that *finally* you can have a good place to live and attract a good mate etc.), and because our everyday tasks are so different from the tasks that were valuable when the &quot;value detectors&quot; evolved.  They knew nothing about unloading the dishwasher, or sitting at the computer typing for hours.  So in many ways I imagine our &quot;value detectors&quot; aren&#039;t very good at determining what is really valuable in today&#039;s world -- hence they sometimes push us &lt;i&gt;away&lt;/i&gt; from things we need to do -- all in the name of making us more productive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes!  I do the same thing.  And I also suspect that, in an ironic way, some of the very mechanisms that originally evolved to make us <i>more</i> productive, in today&#8217;s world actually end up making us <i>less</i> productive.  We probably have mechanisms that are constantly evaluating the activities we&#8217;re engaged in to determine how &#8220;valuable&#8221; they are (to our survival and reproduction).  When an activity has been determined to be valuable, we get a good feeling about it and enjoy doing it (eating, having sex).  But in the same way when an activity is determined to be of low or negative value, we get a bad feeling about it and try to avoid it.</p>
<p>I imagine that our environment now is very different from the one we evolved in, since we have so many very long-term goals (studying so you can &#8220;get an A&#8221; in a class, doing this for years, so that one day you can &#8220;get a good job&#8221; so that you can &#8220;have money&#8221; so that *finally* you can have a good place to live and attract a good mate etc.), and because our everyday tasks are so different from the tasks that were valuable when the &#8220;value detectors&#8221; evolved.  They knew nothing about unloading the dishwasher, or sitting at the computer typing for hours.  So in many ways I imagine our &#8220;value detectors&#8221; aren&#8217;t very good at determining what is really valuable in today&#8217;s world &#8212; hence they sometimes push us <i>away</i> from things we need to do &#8212; all in the name of making us more productive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We&#8217;re All &#8220;Addicts&#8221; by Panopticon</title>
		<link>http://emotionistic.com/posts/were-all-addicts/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Panopticon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emotionistic.com/?p=791#comment-235</guid>
		<description>For me, I find that I waste inordinate amounts of time doing useless stuff because of fear of or anxiety over doing the task that actually matters.  I&#039;m compelled to do the useless stuff because in a way I&#039;m simultaneously compelled to avoid the activity that actually means the most to me...perhaps fear of failure or facing a challenge...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, I find that I waste inordinate amounts of time doing useless stuff because of fear of or anxiety over doing the task that actually matters.  I&#8217;m compelled to do the useless stuff because in a way I&#8217;m simultaneously compelled to avoid the activity that actually means the most to me&#8230;perhaps fear of failure or facing a challenge&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firework Feelings and Children At Play by Jason</title>
		<link>http://emotionistic.com/posts/firework-feelings-and-children-at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emotionistic.com/?p=723#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Glad you found the method interesting, would love to hear how it works out for you.  It&#039;s also an interesting question you bring up about whether feelings can be categorized into &quot;positive&quot; and &quot;negative&quot;.  My own take is that this positive/negative aspect is &lt;i&gt;one part&lt;/i&gt; of feelings, but that there is a lot more to them too.  I also suspect that paying attention to feelings and thinking about them in certain ways (such as by imagining yourself to be watching fireworks, or by &quot;not resisting&quot; them, etc.) may change that positive/negative aspect.  In some cases, perhaps it could lessen or remove the negative aspect of the feeling (the dream!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you found the method interesting, would love to hear how it works out for you.  It&#8217;s also an interesting question you bring up about whether feelings can be categorized into &#8220;positive&#8221; and &#8220;negative&#8221;.  My own take is that this positive/negative aspect is <i>one part</i> of feelings, but that there is a lot more to them too.  I also suspect that paying attention to feelings and thinking about them in certain ways (such as by imagining yourself to be watching fireworks, or by &#8220;not resisting&#8221; them, etc.) may change that positive/negative aspect.  In some cases, perhaps it could lessen or remove the negative aspect of the feeling (the dream!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firework Feelings and Children At Play by Panopticon</title>
		<link>http://emotionistic.com/posts/firework-feelings-and-children-at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Panopticon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 04:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emotionistic.com/?p=723#comment-229</guid>
		<description>I find this method fascinating.  It is intriguing that you suggest rightly to &quot;externalize&quot; not just negative feelings, but feelings as such when they tend to overwhelm.  Perhaps this is to say that there is something misguided in categorizing feelings in such a binary way; maybe the task is to truly realize the tapestry of feelings and see the interconnectedness that blurs the positive/negative dichotomy.  In this way too one would more properly observe the feelings instead of &quot;participating&quot; in the activity of assigning some +/- value to them.  
Theory and my random musings aside, this is something I am going to make an effort to practice.  It is no doubt difficult and I&#039;d love to hear peoples&#039; views on how to remember to observe the sea of emotions instead of drowning in it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this method fascinating.  It is intriguing that you suggest rightly to &#8220;externalize&#8221; not just negative feelings, but feelings as such when they tend to overwhelm.  Perhaps this is to say that there is something misguided in categorizing feelings in such a binary way; maybe the task is to truly realize the tapestry of feelings and see the interconnectedness that blurs the positive/negative dichotomy.  In this way too one would more properly observe the feelings instead of &#8220;participating&#8221; in the activity of assigning some +/- value to them.<br />
Theory and my random musings aside, this is something I am going to make an effort to practice.  It is no doubt difficult and I&#8217;d love to hear peoples&#8217; views on how to remember to observe the sea of emotions instead of drowning in it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Relationships: More Than Just Being Nice? by Kimi</title>
		<link>http://emotionistic.com/posts/not-just-nice-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emotionistic.com/?p=550#comment-207</guid>
		<description>we all agree on jungle friends.... why don&#039;t you come downstairs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we all agree on jungle friends&#8230;. why don&#8217;t you come downstairs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
